Go to the Foreign Affairs home page

Published by the Council on Foreign Relations

Search Archives

Advanced Search



Home

The Current Issue

Background On The News

Browse By Topic

Book Reviews

Back Issues

Academic Resource Program

Subscribe to Foreign Affairs

Search


About Foreign Affairs
Subscriber Services
Newsstand Finder
Permisssions
Advertising
Sponsored Sections
International Editions
Site Map
Contact Us

CFR.org

INTERVIEW: Medvedev Trying to Carve Out New Role as President to Help Modernize Nation
July 2, 2008

INTERVIEW: Seoul's 'Beef' Not About Beef
July 1, 2008

BACKGROUNDER: Food Prices
June 30, 2008


William G. HylandIn Memoriam: William G. Hyland
Confidence in U.S. Foreign Policy IndexConfidence in U.S. Foreign Policy Index
How to Promote Global HealthHow to Promote Global Health
What Now?Roundtable on the Iraq Study Group Report
9/11: A Roundtable9/11:
A Roundtable
Complete list »

Search

Author Page - MICHAEL LIND

Recent Foreign Affairs articles:

2 documents found; displaying 1 to 2.

Civil War by Other Means
Michael Lind
September/October 1999
Summary: The debates over Kosovo blurred the old divisions between liberals and conservatives, but they did not rise above an even older split in American politics and foreign policy: the enduring divide between a hawkish South and a dovish North. Regional differences based on culture and values have made Greater New England the heartland of opposition to foreign wars and the U.S. military establishment since the 1700s; they have also made the South a bastion of interventionism. All too often, the regional divides over U.S. foreign policy have just been a reprise of the Civil War -- and they are a recipe for paralysis.
read 500-word preview | purchase full article

In Defense of Liberal Nationalism
Michael Lind
May/June 1994
Summary: The idea that every nation should have its own state has been the most powerful political force of the past two hundred years. Yet in an age of transnationalism and rising demands for sovereignty, many view secessionist movements as dangerous. U.S. policy harbors a prejudice against nationalism, without distinguishing between benign and malignant strains. Reflexive support for multinational political entities, especially despotic ones, is as misguided as automatically rejecting policies that would create new national homelands. The United States should no longer consider selective support of oppressed minorities as a policy of last resort.
read 500-word preview | purchase full article

1 | 2 

Recent books reviewed in Foreign Affairs:

7 documents found; displaying 1 to 7.

The American Way of Strategy: U.S. Foreign Policy and the American Way of Life.

Michael Lind.

Oxford University Press, 2006.

March/April 2007

read

Made in Texas: George W. Bush and the Southern Takeover of American Politics.

Michael Lind.

New York: Basic Books, 2002.

May/June 2003

read

Vietnam, the Necessary War: A Reinterpretation of America's Most Disastrous Military Conflict.

Michael Lind.

New York: Free Press, 1999.

November/December 1999

read

Hamilton's Republic: Readings in the American Democratic Nationalist Tradition.

Edited by Michael Lind.

New York: Free Press, 1997.

March/April 1998

read

American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword.

Seymour Martin Lipset.

New York: W. W. Norton, 1996.

March/April 1996

read

The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism and the Fourth American Revolution.

Michael Lind.

New York: The Free Press, 1995.

July/August 1995

read

1 | 2 

— ADVERTISEMENT —

— ADVERTISEMENT —